Co-curricular Portfolios and Portfolio for Annual Reviews

I got some insight this morning while attending a presentation by Sharon Hamilton from IUPUI. The session was on co-curricular ePortfolios and I asked: Why would a student who was doing some personal and elective thing want to record that thing in the university’s ePortfolio tool and, further, why would the student be interested in pigeon holing it into one of UIdaho’s Fab Five Learning Outcomes categories?

The idea I got comes from the Transformative Assessment rubric (part of an ELI project on using assessment to transform teaching and learning.)

Under the dimension “Purpose” I find at the transformative end of the scale:

The assessment results are designed for multiple constituencies; the assessment plan includes feedback and corresponding resources and protocols for improving student learning… Assessment is open and fosters reflection.

And

The assessment addresses activities or behaviors that engage students … in reflection and change. Strategies for responding are tied to evidence of change and evidence of conceptualizing and articulating new, valuable outcomes (achievement of outcomes may be secondary to identification of new, more valuable outcomes)

Which leads me to think that students being asked to think about co-curricular portfolios should be helped to think about non-institutional and/or non-traditional tools for building those portfolios — tools that are aligned with the activity (rather than aligned with the institution) [See these thoughts on using blogs and wikis as ePortfolios, and wonder if this can be extrapoated to Flickr and del.icio.us.]

Further, students should be encouraged to keep these portfolios for multiple purposes (show off to Grandma, document activity for self, demonstrate for future employer) and students should be encouraged by their mentors to think not only about outcomes, but about discovering new, more valuable outcomes.

“Look at my cool pictures of our kayak trip, but what I’m really thinking about is how to get the camera more into the action so the viewer can feel the thrill of the river.”

I was primed for the thinking above because we are approaching the end of the year and I’m trying to get a jump on the annual review process. For this year (2006), I’m trying to encourage each employee to have a portfolio repository. A simple one can exist within our internal wiki by collecting together for each person the projects we track in the wiki. (For my CTLT colleagues, it looks like this, created by adding MediaWiki Category tags [Category:Nils 2006] to projects where I was involved.)

I think this starts us down the transformative assessment path. We already track our work using the wiki for multiple reasons, not the least of which is internal communication. Another reason is unit accountability reports. Its an easy matter to make a page that lists all the projects that a person worked on.

There is a certain amount of resentment to our annual review process, typically characterized by “its busywork.” We can compel this busywork, but how can we learn from my co-curricular portfolio insights to help it happen more meaningfully? Using the ideas of the TAP rubric, we need the assessment to serve multiple purposes, and importantly to serve purposes that the employee chooses and values.

In the past (and for 2006) we have had a review process that encourages employee-supervisor discussions about four dimensions.

1. Productivity & Quality
2. Attendance (by which we are meaning ‘attending to’ rather than seat time)
3. Interpersonal Skills & Working Relationships
4. Job Knowledge & Training and Professional Development

Maybe, instead, we should ask employees to find something they think is meaningful to reflect on from the past year, and encourage that “achievement of outcomes may be secondary to identification of new, more valuable outcomes.” We’d ask employees to look for personally valuable outcomes and consider if those outcomes might be goals for 2007. It would be the supervisor’s job to map the reflections of the employee to the unit’s 4 assessment dimensions.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: